NHS faces its biggest challenge since the funding increases seemed like water to a parched flower - funding will cease to grow in 2011. Workforce is the area of biggest spend[1], so reviewing this using
workforce design techniques, and consulting with the staff to bring around culture development, are vital to achieve change in this area
But the 2002 Derek Wanless report (Securing our future health: taking a long-term view) already told us that if we carry on doing health the same way as we do it today, every able person in the country will be occupied looking after the less able - we have to change!
Firstly, understand that there are many ways to achieve the same end. A few very skilled, very highly paid people can provide a very fast service and deliver excellent outcomes: a larger number of less skilled, less highly paid people can spend longer with each patient and deliver equally good outcomes[2] - the choice really seems to depend on your starting point
Of course you need to match the workforce to the need in terms of activity and competency, and I've looked at this in different ways - see Resource & workforce planning for an overview, and more specifically Economic and workforce modelling in urgent & emergency, and workforce reprofiling in acute & mental health as well as the introduction of ECPs to the first contact team. There are more examples on the pages listed below:
So many culture change programmes attempt to align culture to the Chief Executive's view of what the culture should be. It's like getting a marketing company in to write you a vision and mission statement - it sounds great but nobody buys it.
We engage with all the staff, in a four stage approach:
This can be very scary for an unconfident or over-controlling executive board. Are you willing?
There are thousands of books on culture change, many assuming that you can apply the same change processes to public service organisations, and NHS in particular, as you would in the commercial world.
I've identified just three below which I think are the most pertinent, and that don't make these sweeping generalisations
As for workforce design, there's surprisingly little of use: I compiled a list of workforce design tools which is due to appear on the Skills for Health New Ways of Working workforce tools site.
New pages added in the last 45 days (max 5)
John Thorp's book "the information paradox" is probably the foundation on which future benefits realisation has been based. Although it is based around IT projects (notoriously, with a 70% "failure" rate), there is much that can be applied to all environments.
The Demos report "measuring social value: the gap between policy and practice" asks a very important question 'is there a standard method of measuring SROI?'.
The answer is: that depends.
When planning a new project, or evaluating whether an existing service has been successful, financial success is often the only thing that gets counted.