Case for Investment - Innovation in Social Care

Value for Money

Skills for Care sets out to help organisations which provide social care and support for people with mental health issues.

They recognised that a key challenge is getting funding - it can be easy when starting out, because you can apply for grants, but once you've used up your grant, you need to demonstrate evidence of your effectiveness.  This means that you need an EVALUATION (or perhaps, ongoing measurements, reported in a way that means something).

In 2005, Minney.org Ltd ran a programme which we called "From Grants to Sustainable Funding" (TM in progress).  Five organisations brought projects to discuss, and 4 organisations lasted all four months of the programme.

The programme started out highlighting the problem.  All organisations met for a workshop where we shared some of the responses organisations gave.  Grant-awarding organisations such as the National Lottery, BBC Children in Need and FutureBuilders were saying "we gave you money to get started - What have you done with it? We give grants to get you started - when you want to provide services you have to find alternative sources of funding".

Meanwhile the statutory bodies (Local Authority Social Care departments, some NHS organisations) are saying "we will pay you per person you look after.  But you have to demonstrate value for money".

So how do you demonstrate Value for Money?

That's where Evaluation comes in - and more information is listed on the relevant pages.

This programme then went to London as Meet the Dragons.

Minney.org Ltd, now trading as The Social Return Company (TSRC), provides evaluations to the highest internationally recognised standard, which means you can get the funding you need.  Read on . . .

Comments

Recent Additions and Updates

Judicial System - If I were running the country

Scales of JusticeHow do we make the courts run more smoothly?  Cases take too long and are too expensive, mired in endless argument and counter-argument that are the hallmarks of our adversarial system.  What if we were to set time limits?  Would that work?

Well, let's try it.  Each side presents their best evidence, and if magistrate or jury isn't convinced, they can ask for more time from each side.  If it works for Cricket, that most venerable of British institutions, it should work for courts.  Who knows, they may even become spectator sports?

If I were running the country - encouraging business

Minimum wage

Fantasy government - what would I do if I were in government?  Well how about reduce corporation tax, increase income tax, increase minimum wage and invest in job creation in the regions?  That would be a good start - create jobs where there are workers, then make sure that the right amount of tax is collected and at the same time reduce spend on benefits which are only used to increase profits of selfish organisations.

Would it work?  Have your say.

PwC Report on the Current State of Project Management

PwC Project Management ReportPwC found that successful companies are getting more mature in their project management ability.  This raises the game – successful companies have lower costs from fewer failed projects, and less successful companies have to work harder to catch up.  There are some important lessons to take this report for everyone – Read more…

Joy instead of tedium

The Office

Every office has them - the tasks that have to be done that nobody likes doing.  Whether it's the audit, the wages, standard letters, whatever it is - someone has to do it and it feels like a waste of time and money.

Why should you care?

So you employ somebody, so why do you care about how tedious the task is? Well they are costing money, to do something that could be done far more effectively.

Learning from the Past

Evidence for service improvement

Many public service changes have little basis in evidence. Their success (or otherwise) does not appear to depend on how 'good' the policy itself is, but rather on how it has been implemented. This relies on staff attitudes and relationships. My research falls into a number of broad categories: finding out what is currently happening; what people think about it; and what people think it will mean.

Taxonomy upgrade extras: