The Association for Project Management (APM)

Benefits CycleBenefits Management is a small (but important) part of Project Management, like an audit that permeates every part of projects, programmes and portfolio.  Practitioners have developed benefits management ourselves, so why is an organisation self-evidently dedicated to Project Management relevant?

Art or Science?

This mainly depends on whether Benefits Management is an art or a science.  If it is an art, then it requires an artist to identify benefits and monitor progress towards achieving those benefits.

A science makes Benefits Management repeatable and consistent, able to be taught, and perhaps most importantly, to reliably influence decisions rather than simply monitor progress.

I’ve been actively engaged in Benefits Management in not-for-profit since 2002, and since 1990 on calculating RoI and presenting business cases week in week out in various sales jobs.  It certainly started out as an art form for me - very few people could do it well, and I was one of them.  But it’s now clearly a science with a defined process, and you will get the best results if you follow the process.  A specialist form of Benefits Management in the not-for-profit organisation is Social Return on Investment, and that follows a very strict process and has a governing body (the SROI network).

So as Benefits Management becomes a science, it needs a governing body which will develop and improve the process and set expectations on the quality of outcomes and the use they are put to.  This governing body needs to be able to bring the best minds - the most experienced, the most unselfish - together to develop it.  I believe that body is the Association for Project Management (APM).

The APM

Most people involved in any formal way in project or programme management are members of APM, both in UK and worldwide.  UK’s largest organisations in public and private sector are corporate members which allows any and all of their staff to be associate members, and many students undertaking any form of business studies also join as student members.  Why do they bother?

APM offers regular (usually monthly) meetings in each region around UK (I attend the North East branch) where some of the best speakers in UK inspire people on their specific aspect of Project Management.  APM hosts a large number of Special Interest Groups (SIG), including portfolio management, earned value management, governance, and of course benefits management, which develop thought leadership and allow people with an interest and/or expertise to get around the table with others with similar experience/ expertise/ interest and develop it.  These SIG then give talks to the regional groups to help all the membership stay up to date on their profession, so vital if Project Management isn’t your full-time profession, and you don’t expect to read around the subject to stay up to date.

The APM and Benefits Management

The Benefits Management SIG includes John Thorpe (author of “The Information Paradox”), Gerald Bradley (author of “Benefits Realisation Management”), and Steve Jenner (author of “Transforming Government and Public Services”). 

We’ve developed a clear definition of Benefits Management (to be published around September in the 6th edition of APM’s Body of Knowledge)

and a series of Thought Leadership guides on the Why, What, How and What If of Benefits Management.  We’re currently developing the means to use Benefits Management for decision-making during the roll-out of a programme or project, so that decisions are made on the basis of evidence - and the evidence is the actual achievements or proxies which demonstrate progress.  This process will be extended into operational delivery of services, so that front-line staff (shop floor, contact with clients) know what they are achieving and can make changes within the context of the organisation’s strategy, to achieve the best results).  It saves time, it raises profits, and above all, it inspires and engages people! 

Comments

Recent Additions and Updates

Judicial System - If I were running the country

Scales of JusticeHow do we make the courts run more smoothly?  Cases take too long and are too expensive, mired in endless argument and counter-argument that are the hallmarks of our adversarial system.  What if we were to set time limits?  Would that work?

Well, let's try it.  Each side presents their best evidence, and if magistrate or jury isn't convinced, they can ask for more time from each side.  If it works for Cricket, that most venerable of British institutions, it should work for courts.  Who knows, they may even become spectator sports?

If I were running the country - encouraging business

Minimum wage

Fantasy government - what would I do if I were in government?  Well how about reduce corporation tax, increase income tax, increase minimum wage and invest in job creation in the regions?  That would be a good start - create jobs where there are workers, then make sure that the right amount of tax is collected and at the same time reduce spend on benefits which are only used to increase profits of selfish organisations.

Would it work?  Have your say.

PwC Report on the Current State of Project Management

PwC Project Management ReportPwC found that successful companies are getting more mature in their project management ability.  This raises the game – successful companies have lower costs from fewer failed projects, and less successful companies have to work harder to catch up.  There are some important lessons to take this report for everyone – Read more…

Joy instead of tedium

The Office

Every office has them - the tasks that have to be done that nobody likes doing.  Whether it's the audit, the wages, standard letters, whatever it is - someone has to do it and it feels like a waste of time and money.

Why should you care?

So you employ somebody, so why do you care about how tedious the task is? Well they are costing money, to do something that could be done far more effectively.

Learning from the Past

Evidence for service improvement

Many public service changes have little basis in evidence. Their success (or otherwise) does not appear to depend on how 'good' the policy itself is, but rather on how it has been implemented. This relies on staff attitudes and relationships. My research falls into a number of broad categories: finding out what is currently happening; what people think about it; and what people think it will mean.

Taxonomy upgrade extras: