I met some old college friends over the weekend, and realised the contrast between those following their passion, and those who'd accidentally ended up where they were. It made me wonder "am I following my dream?"
I'm passionate about the benefits work I do because i believe that it can make a difference.
Department of Health produced a poster designed to show all of the ways of making efficiencies in line with the Gershon reviews.
It never really took off, but none-the-less I contributed the workforce aspects from Changing Workforce Programme
"10 High Impact Changes" presaged the NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement style of publications - documents written to be accessible and useable for the NHS at large and the public, which gave shortcuts to the achievement of service improvement. It was naturally followed by a whole spate of spin-off documents - "10 High Impact Changes for Primary Care", "10 High Impact Changes in Mental Health", etc
Dr Hugo Minney gained his PhD in protein chemistry in 1990, and has worked in Agriculture, Academia, Information Technology, Sales and Business Consulting, and Service Improvement. Prior to joining the NHS in 2004, he was with Cap Gemini Ernst & Young, and Manpower Software (developing Workforce Planning and Team Optimisation software for NHS).
The Competence and Curriculum Framework defines what an ECP is and what training they require. At present (July 08) the title is not a restricted title so anyone can, technically, use it; this is being taken through the long process to help it become a restricted title.
As this document is quite large the link to the document is here http://minney.org/Publications/SfH_ECP_88pp_CCFW.pdf
"Measuring the Benefits" looks at the evidence for urgent care practitioners caring for patients effectively. It compares paramedics and advanced paramedics (in research from USA, Canada, Australia and Europe) with advanced nurse practitioners and ECPs (in UK pilots). The evidence is overwhelming - there are no shortcuts to delivering better care. Paramedics and advanced paramedics don't have the confidence nor training to diagnose, treat and refer a significant number of patients away from Accident & Emergency safely; result is they aren't cost-effective.
This was one of the defining reports for the Emergency Care Practitioner. Launched by Prof Sir George Alberti in October 2004, it explains what ECPs are (or can be), where they were at the time, how much they cost to develop and what the Return on Investment is (these two were my bits).
The people who deliver care to patients are clinicians, so to create change we (service improvers) need to engage. Clinicians often know the problems, and with the right help will both develop solutions and implement them. Facilitated session supporting clinicians to talk about the engagement they require.
School Health - a vital topic. But how do you justify spend on school nurses, when their impact won't be felt for years? NHS Employers' Large Scale Workforce Change group commissioned me to train sites in development of an evaluation and benefits realisation methodology, and then to use it . .
Just before joining NHS, my last project was to examine the options for an international agency provider of service staff to enter NHS market and provide temporary staffing from suitable countries.
As part of the wider project examining options for redesign of emergency and unscheduled care for NHS across London, I prepared the detailed modelling (workforce, financial, business change).
This group has representatives from SHAs and national agencies and is set up to identify the issues relating to the introduction of new, enhanced and extended roles in healthcare and in particular those issues which need national support. Within this role I prepared the Baseline Report (below) and begun work developing the communications strategy ,which includes designing a web site to share information, interviewing potential users about their needs and preferred mode of communication, and reviewing the styles of similar web sites.
Before planning new projects, the National Governance Group needed to know what was currently happening. Reconfiguration in NHS meant that a lot of corporate memory had moved on or left, but I managed to identify 700+ projects and interview 41 stakeholders to identify both the current state of New Ways of Working and the support which would offer most value.
The baseline report and its conclusions were accepted and the examples, new and existing roles and workforce innovation tools are now being collated for sharing.
Determining the commissioning capability of the PCT with the largest in-year deficit in England as it copes post-merger, and with stakeholder and provider changes.
The audit both highlighted areas for improvement and triggered some of the required cultural change within the PCT
Workforce is the single biggest part of the healthcare budget, and it's tempting to impose draconian measures such as recruitment freezes. But what will actually work best to improve quality at the same time as reducing costs?
Review of a diabetes Locally Enhanced Service which identified the cost-benefit of the LES and worked with GPs to improve this.
A PCT requested myself and a colleague to run a programme to redesign the process of booking patients in for community services eg long-term conditions management (it covered all services delivered in PCT buildings). Involving staff, stakeholders and service users revealed that the overall community service could be run more cost-effectively, and more appropriately for service users at the same time supporting healthcare staff, by devolving administration to the community buildings rather than centralising. The PCT was extremely pleased with the result.
Community Matrons were asked to report on activity levels as a way of justifying their costs, but they wanted a more outcomes-based way of reporting. We developed a balanced scorecard aligned to the employing provider organisation and commissioning organisation’s own key priorities.
New pages added in the last 45 days (max 5)

Which is better - private funding or public? Which gives a better outcome for the individual (* clinical outcome, * user experience, * cost-effective, * sustainable) and is there a clear picture?
One way to examine this question is to look at different countries in the world and see what works for them. I tackle this in the latest blog on Technorati.
I ask you - if you were to design a new national health service from scratch, would you really design it with nobody to think ahead and make decisions on resources?
So why are the main political parties in UK engaging in their favourite sport of manager bashing?

Do you see gossip as a waste of time? Do you suffer from spiteful or destructive rumours, disrupting the team and destroying team spirit? Do you find it impossible to control - chop off one head and two more appear somewhere else?
Read how Minney.org helps organisations to use this social glue for good ...
You only have one chance to make a first impression.
In fact, you only have one chance each time, to make a first impression that sets the scene for that day, that job, that opportunity.
What of those toilet cubicles which allow for both sexes - they have a little notice on the outside saying "either"?